Becker's ASC Review

Nov/Dec 2016 Issue of Becker's ASC Review

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/759093

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 45 of 51

46 CODING & BILLING 19 Things to Know About Orthopedic Bundled Payments By Anuja Vaidya H ere are 19 more things to know about bundled payments for the second half of 2016. Regulatory updates 1. Late last year, CMS finalized the Compre- hensive Care for Joint Replacement model, under which acute-care hospitals in certain selected geographic locations will receive ret- rospective bundled payments for episodes of care for lower extremity joint replacement or reattachment of a lower extremity. e CJR model went into effect on April 1, 2016. e model is required for the 794 hospitals located in 67 metropolitan statistical areas throughout the country. 1 2. An Avalere analysis detailed the average cost per CJR episode by care setting: • Inpatient hospital stay: $13,193 • Skilled nursing facility: $5,034 • Inpatient rehabilitation facility: $1,568 • Home health agency: $2,123 • Physician: $1,675 • Hospital readmissions: $1,155 • Outpatient: $604 • Durable medical equipment: $122 3. e total Medicare payment in CJR per episode will be $25,565 with 39 percent tied to post-discharge care, according to the same Avalere analysis. 4. CMS recently released the first data feed of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model, which reflected updates and correc- tions to the previously released baseline files. e data feed includes episodes beginning in April, May and June. e new format includes a wage adjustment and a wage standard. In a Becker's Spine Review article, Kelly Price, vice president and chief of healthcare data analytics at Rensselaer, N.Y.-based DataGen, said hospi- tals should not use this initial data feed to mea- sure financial performance. 5. Some organizations are concerned about potential downsides of the CJR model. On Sept. 7, the American Academy of Orthopae- dic Surgeons submitted a four-page letter to the House Budget Committee hearing on the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation. In the letter, AAOS raised concerns about how the new Medicare bundled payment model for joint replacement surgery would impact orthopedic payments. e AAOS is also con- cerned that the model imposes monetary pen- alties on physicians performing joint replace- ment surgeries on disadvantaged patients since postoperative care is more intensive for these patients. 2 6. In April, CMS extended Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participation option deadline. Participants can now extend partici- pation in Models 2, 3 and 4 through Sept. 30, 2018. e initiative has 1,522 participants. Hospital-employer bundled payment partnerships 7. Companies are beginning to partner with healthcare facilities to initiate bundled payment programs for their employees. In June, Cleveland-based University Hos- pitals agreed to provide General Electric employees with joint replacement care as part of the company's National Hip and Knee Replacement Centers of Excellence Program, which offers a bundled payment model. 8. Similarly in April, Chicago-based Rush Health signed a direct employer contract to provide orthopedic and spine surgeries to United Airlines' employees. Employees who receive surgery at Rush Health facilities, under the partnership, are not responsible for co-payment and coinsurance costs. Clinical/financial research on bundled payments 9. A study published in the International Journal of Spine Surgery examined bundled payments and how they could affect resource utilization during spine surgery. ere were 43 surgeons who completed the survey. In every scenario, there were surgeons who reported they would change at least one aspect of their practice with bundled payments — with 24 percent to 49 percent of the surgeons reporting change for each scenario. Also, neuromonitor- ing would decrease in all scenarios by an aver- age of 21 percent. 3 10. At the Bundled Payment Summit in June, Coleen Kivlahan, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, noted alternate payment models do not recognize the differences between various joint replacement procedures. ere are two Diagnosis Related Group, or DRG, codes for lower extremity OrthoCarolina was able to lower costs by 10 percent to 30 percent by creating a physician- owned bundled payment. Tired of the constant battle for reimbursement? Receive Value-Based Pricing! Currently working with TPAs and Self-Insured Companies nationally. Looking to add the Best Surgeons and ASCs to our network. DOES THIS SOUND LIKE YOU? If so, CALL (623) 561-4004 and e-mail: JohnW@Esurgeries.com

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's ASC Review - Nov/Dec 2016 Issue of Becker's ASC Review