Becker's Hospital Review

November 2017 Issue of Beckers Hospital Review

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/898852

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 76 of 103

77 FINANCE CMO / CARE DELIVERY Hershey Medical Center Cited for Care Delays That Contributed to 2 Patient Deaths By Brian Zimmerman S tate health officials recently issued five citations against Penn State Health's Milton S. Hershey (Pa.) Medical Center over de- layed care for three patients, two of which later died, according to the Lebanon Daily News. Here are six things to know. 1. The citations and subsequent corrective actions stemmed from an un- announced special monitoring survey conducted by the Pennsylvania Department of Health from July 3 to July 21. 2. The investigative survey found the hospital was noncompliant with several state requirements and regulations. The hospital failed to imple- ment emergency procedures in a timely manner after a pediatric patient was assessed as having an elevated heart rate and high temperature. The child went into septic shock and was moved to the intensive care unit. Several days later, the child met criteria for brain death. The state found the rapid response team should have been called in to care for the patient around noon the day of incident. The team was called at 3:30 p.m. according to the Lebanon Daily News. 3. In a second case, the state found the hospital failed to initiate a "brain attack protocol" in a timely manner on June 11. The protocol is meant to be initiated when a patient has had or is having a stroke. Hospital staff observed the patient was "not making sense, slow to follow commands/ had difficulty following commands" at 9:56 p.m. At 12:15 a.m., a nurse documented a discussion of the "need to call emergency department brain attack at this time. Awaiting further orders." 4. On July 22, an injured patient who fell was admitted to the hospital from the emergency department. The staff ordered medication to treat blood clotting issues at 5:47 a.m. It was confirmed by the pharmacy at 6:49 a.m., but not administered to the patient until 8:36 a.m. The pa- tient later died from a subdural hemorrhage. After conducting employ- ee interviews, investigators determined part of the delay was caused by nurses waiting for a shift change before administering the medicine, according to the Lebanon Daily News. 5. The hospital will take several corrective actions in the wake of the cita- tions, including educating staff about the rapid response team process, medication turn-around times and brain attack protocols. "Instances such as this are inconsistent with the high-quality care our community has come to expect from us — and which we expect from ourselves," said the hospital in a statement obtained by Lebanon Daily News. "We deeply regret when we fall short of those expectations. We realize the importance of our ongoing efforts to evaluate and improve our patient care practices; to ensure staff have the knowledge they need to consistently meet the highest standards of care; and to reinforce ex- pectations for employees to elevate concerns they may have, particular- ly where patient care is involved." 6. The hospital has come under fire for patient safety issues in recent months. In August, state health officials cited the hospital in the death of a 6-year-old boy who was admitted to the emergency room Jan. 10 with low body temperature. The boy was subsequently wrapped in a heated blanket overnight and found dead the next morning. n CMS Postpones October Hospital Star Ratings Update: 5 Things to Know By Brian Zimmerman C MS delayed its October update of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings on its Hospital Compare website, according to AHA News Now. Here are five things to know. 1. e star rating system combines multiple quality measures into a single one-to-five star rating. While consumer groups like AARP lauded the release of the star ratings in July 2016, the American Hos- pital Association, other hospital groups and some in academia have since expressed serious concern regarding the methodology behind the ratings. One major concern is that the measure does not account for the social determinants of health. 2. CMS scheduled the October update aer de- ciding not to update the ratings in July. e agen- cy cancelled that update due to issues with three quality measures: central line-associated blood- stream infections, Clostridium difficile infections and PSI-90. 3. Ashley ompson, the senior vice president of public policy analysis and development with AHA, urged CMS to remove the star ratings from its Hos- pital Compare website in a Sept. 25 letter addressed to Kate Goodrich, MD, the CMO of CMS. "At a minimum, the AHA strongly urges CMS to remove the star ratings from Hospital Compare and not republish them until it corrects the errors and outside experts agree that the updated meth- odology is executed correctly," Ms. ompson wrote. "Even if CMS can improve the implemen- tation of the current methodology, we continue to have significant concerns about the conceptual un- derpinnings of star ratings. e measures included in the ratings were never intended to create a sin- gle, representative score of hospital quality." 4. The overall quality star ratings from Decem- ber 2016 remain posted on CMS' Hospital Com- pare website. Of the 4,598 hospitals rated on the website, just 83 — less than 2 percent — carry five-star ratings. 5. CMS has not said when updated overall star rat- ings will be released. n

Articles in this issue

view archives of Becker's Hospital Review - November 2017 Issue of Beckers Hospital Review