Becker's ASC Review

Jan/Feb 2017 Issue of Becker's ASC Review

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/774636

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 54 of 63

55 GI & ENDOSCOPY SECTION OVER 30 YEARS OF MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT EXPERTISE. www.smpsd.com | 605.444.8207 | info@smpsd.com Providing Custom Solutions Increase Efficiencies & Maxmize Profit With Surgical Management Professionals! Endoscopy Combined With Antiplatelets or Anticoagulant Agents Safe for Identifying GI Bleeding: 5 Key Notes By Eric Oliver A study in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is the first case series to test the benefits and safety of provocative testing combined with endoscopy. Here's what you need to know. 1. Researchers from Baton Rouge-based Louisiana State Uni- versity Health led the study in an attempt to find gastrointes- tinal bleeding. 2. GI bleeding occurs in more than 500,000 patient cases each year. If the bleeding isn't identified and contained, it can cause patient death. It also stains hospital resources because of the need for repeated transfusions and hospitalizations. 3. The LSU Health team administered blood thinners to the patients to identify the source of the bleeding. The research- ers reviewed a database of endoscopic procedures and identified 27 patients with refractory bleeding who received provocative agents during treatment. 4. The patients all had anemia or persistent bleeding. Pro- vocative testing was successful in 15 patients, or 56 percent of the patients. 5. Lead author Daniel Raines, MD, said the decision to provoke bleeding in patients without knowing the source "should not be taken lightly." He believes the study demon- strates that provocative endoscopy can be used successfully when the risk is necessary. n The decision to provoke bleeding in patients without knowing the source "should not be taken lightly." -Daniel Raines, MD, lead author

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's ASC Review - Jan/Feb 2017 Issue of Becker's ASC Review