Becker's Spine Review

Becker's Spine Review Sept/Oct 2016

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/730929

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 71 of 83

1. Linovitz RJ, Pathria M, Bernhardt M, Green D, Law MD, McGuire RA, Montesano PX, Rechtine G, Salib RM, Ryaby JT, Faden JS, Ponder R, Muenz LR, Magee FP, Garfin SA. Combined Magnetic Fields Accelerate and Increase Spine Fusion; A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial. Spine Journal, Volume 27:13 (1383-1389), July 2002 2. Ilyas Aleem, MD, Idris Aleem, MSc, Nathan Evaniew, MD, Hamilton, Michael J. Yaszemski, MD, PhD, Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, Mohit Bhandari, MD, FRCSC, PhD, Efficacy of Electrical Stimulators for Bone Healing: A Meta- Analysis of Sham-Controlled Randomized Trials, Presented at AAOS Poster Session (no. 520) 2016 ©2016 DJO,LLC Bone stimulators, are a non-invasive externally applied device intended to stimulate healing of damaged tissue, and have been around for decades with focused evidence of their effectiveness. 1 A new study, Efficacy of Electrical Stimulators for Bone Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Sham-Controlled Randomized Trials, was completed to support evidence-based recommendations for use in clinical practice. • Electrical stimulation demonstrated a 35% reduced risk of non-union against control group. 2 • Meta Analysis had a high confidence level and p<0.01, demonstrating statistical significance. 2 • For every 7 patients treated with electrical stimulation, 1 nonunion or persistent nonunion can be prevented (NNT = 7). 2 • Meta Analysis revealed statistical significance in patient reported pain outcomes (p=0.02 and I 2 = 0), demonstrating a reduction in pain with treatment. 2 Compelling New Evidence on the Efficacy of Electrical Bone Stimulators Visit djoglobal.com/cmf for more information.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's Spine Review - Becker's Spine Review Sept/Oct 2016