Becker's ASC Review

Becker's ASC Review March/April 2016

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/651018

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 54 of 63

55 M edical errors are common in the United States, however, many are also preventable. Here are 10 notes on medical errors. 1. Since the 1999 Institutes of Medicine report "To Err is Human," annual adverse events have hit 100,000 to 400,000 per year, according to a Philly.com article written by Maryanne McGuckin, Dr.ScEd, FSHEA, president of McGuckin Methods International and member of the World Health Or- ganization's Global Patient Safety Challenge. 1 2. ere are 120 adverse events per 100,000 hospi- tal admissions each year. ere are around 4,000 surgical near-misses or adverse events, including wrong-site surgery. 1 3. Similarly, a 2015 Vox article stated that medi- cal errors ranked third among the leading causes of death in the United States. Around 2 percent to 3 percent of the people who go into hospitals receive severe harm as a result. 4. According to U.S. News & World Report, the following are the most common preventable medical errors: 2 • Medication errors • Too many blood transfusions • Too much oxygen for premature babies • Healthcare-associated infections • Infections from central lines 5. A 2015 study in Anesthesiology found that one in 20 perioperative medication administrations included a medication error and/or adverse drug event. 3 A total of 277 operations were observed with 3,671 medication administrations of which 193 involved a medication error and/or adverse drug event. Of these, 79.3 percent were prevent- able and 20.7 percent were nonpreventable. 6. Hospitals were the main site for sentinel events from 2004 to 2015, with 6,248 events reported, according to e Joint Commission. 4 Ambula- tory care organizations were the site of 351 senti- nel events in that decade. e Joint Commission defines a sentinel event as "an unexpected occur- rence involving death or serious physical or psy- chological injury, or the risk thereof." 7. While checklists are oen used in healthcare settings to try to prevent adverse patient events, a 2015 study in JAMA Surgery found that checklist- based quality improvement initiatives may not be effective at achieving that goal. Researchers exam- ined Michigan Hospital Association's Keystone Surgery effort, a checklist-based quality improve- ment intervention implemented by many hos- pitals in the state. Program implementation was not associated with improved outcomes in the 14 hospitals participating in Keystone Surgery, ac- cording to study results. 8. In June 2015, the National Patient Safety Foun- dation released guidelines developed to help healthcare organizations improve the way they investigate medical errors, adverse events and near misses. NPSF, with a grant from e Doctors Company Foundation, convened a panel of ex- perts and stakeholders to examine best practices around root cause analyses and developed new standardized guidelines. 9. e issue of medical errors is also clear on the state-level. According to a Harvard School of Public Health, around 25 percent of the people in Massachusetts reported experiencing a medical error within the past five years. e wrong test, surgery or treatment was given to 38 percent of the people who reported medical errors; 32 per- cent reported getting the wrong medication. 10. Medical errors in Indiana skyrocketed in 2015, making them comparable to those of Washington. Hospitals and other healthcare facilities in Indiana reported a total of 114 preventable adverse medi- cal events in 2014. Washington had 483 reported preventable adverse medical events in 2014. n References: 1. Philly.com, "Medical errors remain all too com- mon - and deadly." 2. US News & World Report. "5 Common Prevent- able Medical Errors." 3. Anesthesiology. "Evaluation of Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events." 4. e Joint Commission. "Summary Data of Sen- tinel Events." 10 Things to Know About Medical Errors By Anuja Vaidya Longer Surgical Resident Hours Don't Hinder Patient Care, Study Says By Max Green E xtending hours for surgical residents doesn't nega- tively affect patient care, according to a New England Journal of Medicine study. In fact, longer hours may im- prove patient recovery if surgical residents stay with patients post-operation or are on hand to help stabilize them in criti- cal situations, according to the authors. Researchers analyzed data from 117 residency programs across 151 hospitals and health systems and found those using more flexible duty hours for residents yielded no significant difference in residents' self-reported satisfaction, overall well-being, quality of training or patient outcomes for 10 metrics. The conclusions of the new study, which were presented at the Academic Surgical Congress on Tuesday, are a bit counterintuitive. Longer clinical hours are often associated with fatigue, burnout or slip-ups, and the issue has attracted regulatory attention. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education revised its policies around shift hours for residents twice, first in 2003 and again in 2011. The 2003 revision mandated that residents work under 80 hours per week, including restrictions for minimum amount of time between shifts and caps on overnight shift length. The 2011 update decreased the acceptable shift length for residents and increased the amount of time they are required to take off between shifts. However, the authors suggest the real cause of errors in patient care occur during hand-offs, when a physician or medical staffer updates the incoming clinicians about the status of a patient. "In surgery, this more frequent turnover may compromise continuity of patient care, potentially jeopardize patient safety and decrease the quality of resident education by forcing residents to leave at critical times, such as in the middle of an operation or while stabilizing a critically ill pa- tient," Karl Bilimoria, MD, director of the Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago and co-author of the study, said in a statement. Greater flexibility in surgical resident works hours can pre- vent patient care disruptions without impacting outcomes or surgical education, the authors concluded. n Quality

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's ASC Review - Becker's ASC Review March/April 2016