Becker's Clinical Quality & Infection Control

Becker's Infection Control and Clinical Quality July 2014

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/351038

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 17

SANITEYES HAND SANITATION MONITORING It is well documented that hand sanitation is a major factor in controlling the transmission of infection within healthcare and that an understanding of actual hand sanitation practices is essential to improvement. What is the next step after concluding your institution has a very high compliance rate? New technology provides a new solution to this issue. You might worry on what type of compliance rate you are measuring. Compliance is often taken to be synonymous with adherence rate, the ratio of acts of hand hygiene when the opportunity exists to the total number of hand hygiene opportunities. Much emphasis has been placed on 1 the denominator where the opportunities are defined by the WHO five moments. The numerator (acts of hand hygiene) has often been considered to any instance of hand sanitation, such as the dispensing of soap or disinfectant. The WHO has indicated the numerator should be the total number of times an HCW was observed to have appropriately washed his or her hands before and after a patient encounter. Appropriate hand sanitation for both washing or the application of 2 alcoholbased formulations requires both a sufficient duration and sufficient friction of application. Most institutions have a standard of 1520 seconds of washing as a required minimum, studies have shown that most washes are significantly shorter. While the effect of shortened washes 3 has received little attention, one study showed washing hands for 15 seconds achieves a microbial kill of 10 0.61.1 and for 30 seconds, 10 1.82.8 , more than a tenfold improvement. 4 Observation has been called the "gold standard" of compliance monitoring as duration, 5 coverage and friction can be considered. Despite expense, privacy concerns and subjective evaluation issues, institutions have used the "secret shopper" employment of coworkers for surreptitious observation and reporting of hand sanitation practices. The "secret shopper" 6 results are questionable because of the "Hawthorne effect", the tendency of some people to perform better and work harder when they are observed. This has been attributed to a 7.75fold higher compliance rate for observation as co mpared to measurement of product use statistics without observation. 7 A different method of hand sanitation compliance monitoring, the SanitEyes system , 8 overcomes the issues associated with previous monitoring methods. It consists of an inexpensive system with a camera monitoring of the wash area attached to a processor for a 1 http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/hh_monograph.pdf p. 29 2 WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/9789241597906/en/ p. 247 3 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1991; 12:4228. 4 http://cdaadc.ca/jcda/vol66/issue10/546.html 5 http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/hh_monograph.pdf p.19 6 http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/HOM228830/Secretshoppershelpimprovehandhygienecom pliance.html 7 Scheithauer, et al. AJIC 2009; 37:83541 8 www.saniteyes.com CONTENT ADVERTORIAL

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's Clinical Quality & Infection Control - Becker's Infection Control and Clinical Quality July 2014