Becker's Hospital Review

Becker's Hospital Review February 2014

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/247519

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 21 of 47

Clinical Integration & ACOs 22 It's Not Easy to Engage Patients — Even for ACOs By Molly Gamble "Even in the ACO model, unless there's a distinct return on investment, patient engagement programs will be overlooked." P atient-centered care is a cornerstone of any accountable care organization, but creating or joining one doesn't necessarily make patient engagement any easier. In the world of healthcare business, patient engagement may sound like a "soft" concept, but its difficulty is nothing to underestimate. David Muhlestein, PhD, director of research at Leavitt Partners in Salt Lake City, says a minority of patients want to be engaged with their care teams in actively managing their healthcare. The high majority — likely approaching 70 percent — want to turn their care over to their physician and have them take the reigns. The rest of patients do not want to share decisions about their healthcare with physicians at all — they prefer to decide on their own.  "ACOs are finding it's really hard to get people engaged," says Dr. Muhlestein. "Some are proactive or are really trying to engage patients in different ways, but they're not particularly seeing more success than anyone else." What is working for ACOs' patient engagement? What are the biggest roadblocks? As it turns out, there are several definitions of patient responsibility, high-deductible health plans are bad news for accountable care and no ACO provider will be successful on a high horse. Seven degrees of engagement There are numerous buzzwords for patient responsibility — patient engagement, accountability, skin in the game. It's easy to lump these ideas together as synonymous, but Dr. Muhlestein says there are some nuances. For example, patients and physicians may arrive with different expectations for patient engagement. Patients see it as shared decision-making, or talking to a physician before a decision is made about their treatment to learn about the pros and cons, then making the ultimate decision in conjunction with the physician. It's a behavior largely reserved for the visit to the physician. Physicians, on the other hand, see engagement as active condition management. This includes lifestyle changes, adherence to medications and regular dialogue with the care team to ensure the care plan is going smoothly. Essentially, this version of patient engagement involves the patient taking on more responsibilities that traditionally belonged to clinicians and carrying them out between physician visits. People who have used accountants to complete income taxes may see where patients are coming from. Instead of doing a few tasks on a daily basis, many people find it easier to drop off their financial paperwork and receipts at the end of the year and let someone else do the math. The same is often true for patients' expectations for healthcare. "You want to say, 'Here, you deal with this. I'll come back next month and you'll tell me how to change the doses of my meds,'" says Dr. Muhlestein. How having "skin in the game" could muddle accountable care There's another shade of patient responsibility, one that is a little greener in hue. More patients are taking on more financial responsibility for their

Articles in this issue

view archives of Becker's Hospital Review - Becker's Hospital Review February 2014