Becker's Hospital Review

Becker's Hospital Review April 2013 Issue

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/170070

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 52 of 63

Sign up for the COMPLIMENTARY Becker's Hospital Review CEO Report & CFO Report E-Weeklies at www.BeckersHospitalReview.com or call (800) 417-2035 53 5 Things the Most Extraordinary Hospital CEOs Do By Molly Gamble  T here isn't a trusted scorecard to accurately assess a healthcare CEO's performance. But there are a handful of skills the most remarkable leaders know and demonstrate every day in the C-suite. Quint Studer, founder of Studer Group, says he's observed five skills and abilities that the most effective hospital and health system CEOs predictably demonstrate. 1. Extraordinary CEOs objectively diagnose the organization's ailments. The ability to properly identify and assess problems is the foundation of healthcare. Much like physicians and other healthcare professionals, CEOs are expected to properly diagnose the "illness" before they can apply the "cure." The best hospital and health system CEOs objectively identify problems within their organizations and constantly push employees to improve or maintain top performance. Why isn't this a habit among all CEOs? Proximity and poor estimation, says Mr. Studer. "Leaders can sometimes be 'too close' to the organization to objectively assess its performance," he says. "As a result, they'll overestimate and think their leadership and the hospital's performance is better than it is." For example, in a recent Studer Group survey based on responses from more than 300 hospital and health system CEOs, a number of leaders identified clinical quality of care as their organization's number one strength. Upon closer inspection of those organizations' quality metrics and information, Studer Group found many of those CEOs had overestimated their clinical performance.   Such overconfidence is fairly common among CEOs, he says, and it's a major flaw that will wreak havoc throughout the hospital or system. "Top CEOs have a responsibility to objectively self-assess themselves and their organization," says Mr. Studer. "That's critical." 2. They drive variability out of leadership. Much has been written about variation within healthcare delivery and clinical care, but variability within management and administration has received far less scrutiny. That's too bad, says Mr. Studer, as leadership inconsistencies at any level can harm employee morale, turnover, talent selection and hiring. "When we ask CEOs to evaluate their senior leadership teams, we ask them to measure consistency in system-wide leadership practices on a scale of one to 10," he explains. "The average we see is a 5.5. We recommend CEOs and senior leaders sit down and decide which leadership practices are absolutely mandatory — and then, standardize them." One common problem? Meetings. "There are too many meetings that are too long and not well-organized," says Mr. Studer. "Yet, despite these problems, most leaders do not follow meeting templates or agendas. When inconsistencies like this linger at the top of the organization, they tend to trickle down throughout the rest of the hospital or system." What's more, a single executive who strays from standardized procedures can hold the entire organization back. Mr. Studer says he worked with 11 executives at an organization that wanted to reduce its turnover. Even though turnover decreased and stabilized, the rate was still higher than what the organization set out to reach. "When we dug into it, we found we had one senior leader who didn't follow the new program," says Mr. Studer. "The turnover rate stagnated because that senior leader wasn't following agreed-upon practices." 3. They align their outlook with their organization's outlook. Say you called 20 hospital CEOs and another 20 hospital managers, supervisors and directors and asked these two groups, "Will the healthcare environment in the next five years be very difficult, difficult, the same, easy or very easy?" Mr. Studer says most CEOs and executive team members respond with "very difficult" to "difficult," while managers are more likely to say "difficult" to "the same." CEOs and managers have different responsibilities and workloads, so it is to be expected that their outlooks will not match. Yet, this gap in urgency can ultimately make an organization fail. Narrowing this gap comes down to how well CEOs communicate the pressures their organizations face in the moment, as well as those that are on the way. "CEOs must communicate the healthcare environment to every stakeholder so they can align their sense of urgency," he says. "You can't be successful if four out of 10 leaders aren't willing to change." 4. They don't underestimate how change affects employees. Recently, Mr. Studer visited a hospital that was constructing a new multi-million-dollar facility on its campus. He noted how closely hospital management followed the construction process and tracked its progress. Yet very rarely is such steady and detailed attention paid to changes or initiatives among employees, he points out. "We micromanage construction projects but we don't micromanage human processes," says Mr. Studer. "That's a mistake, because human change is the key to everything." Mr. Studer describes four categories of employees. First are the unconsciously incompetent, or those who don't know what they don't know. Then there are the consciously incompetent, or people who know what they don't know; followed by the consciously competent, who are beginning to master the process; and finally the unconsciously competent. Processes come naturally to this last group. They can cook a dish without looking at the recipe. A major misunderstanding in healthcare management is to assume the organization's high performers, or the unconsciously competent employees, will have the easiest time changing their processes. The best CEOs know this is not so. "High performers have been doing that process for such a long time, it's become a habit," says Mr. Studer. "They already feel successful, so what they don't want to do is go backwards and feel like they're starting over. CEOs can underestimate how hard a change will be, even for high performers." This dynamic can explain why a hospital's top-

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's Hospital Review - Becker's Hospital Review April 2013 Issue