Becker's ASC Review

January/February 2023 Issue of Becker's ASC Review

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/1491055

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 6 of 39

7 ASC MANAGEMENT Where the relationship between ASCs and payers stands today By Riz Hatton A SCs and payers continue to face obstacles as they work through the challenges and changes of today's healthcare environment. e push to low-cost settings As payers push for physicians to perform procedures in low-cost settings, ASCs are becoming a go-to facility for physicians. "With the continued rising cost of patient care in the hospital setting, ASCs have become many insurance companies' preference for outpatient surgery," Dianna Reed, administrator of Sani Eye Surgery Center in Templeton, Calif., told Becker's. Reimbursement rates fail to budge Payers regularly pay more to hospital outpatient departments than to ASCs for the same procedures. Private insurer payments to hospital outpatient departments were 2.6 times larger than payments to ASCs from 2018 to 2020, and Medicare payments were 2.1 times larger, according to research published by the Rand Corp. "Most of my time is spent on payer negotiations and payer issues. I spend more time negotiating with payers than I ever expected in this role," Jessica Rodriguez, administrator of OAM Surgery Center at MidTowne in Grand Rapids, Mich., told Becker's. "e payment landscape for ASCs is another big challenge that we face. Costs are going up exponentially, but we are not seeing a corresponding increase in reimbursement." Prior authorizations remain a roadblock ere have been several wins and losses for ASCs in the push for prior authorization reform in 2022. Still, 79 percent of medical groups said that payer prior authorization requirements increased since 2021. "My biggest industry concern is the ever increasing barriers by payers to provide high- value care to our most vulnerable patients in a timely fashion," Kenneth Nwosu, MD, a spine surgeon at NeoSpine in Puyallup, Wash., told Becker's. "Over time, it appears that the default decision for procedures needing prior authorization is a denial, as indicated by a rising number of peer-to- peer reviews where the reviewing physician openly states that the ordered surgery should not have been denied. Alternatively, I am seeing more denials where a peer-to-peer review time is dictated by the payer, which is oen in conflict with the treating physician's availability. In some instances, there is not an option to partake in a peer-to-peer review following a denial." n Largest ASC chains by number of physicians By Patsy Newitt D allas-based United Surgical Partners International, subsidiary of Tenet Healthcare, is the largest ASC chain in the country by centers and number of physicians. Here are the largest ASC chains by number of affiliated physicians. 1. United Surgical Partners International: 11,000+ physicians 2. SCA Health (Deerfield, Ill.): 9,200 physicians 3. Surgery Partners (Brentwood, Tenn.): 4,600 physicians 4. HCA Healthcare (Nashville, Tenn.): 3,200 physicians 5. ValueHealth (Leawood, Kan.): 3,000+ physicians 6. SurgCenter Development (Towson, Md.): 2,500 physicians n Over half of ASCs 100% physician-owned By Claire Wallace F ifty-two percent of Medicare-certified ASCs in the U.S. are 100 percent physician-owned, according to the most recent data from Advancing Surgical Care. Twenty-one percent of ASCs are jointly owned by physicians and hospitals, while 15 percent are jointly owned by physicians and corporations. Only 7 percent are jointly owned by physicians, hospitals and corporations together, and only 3 percent are 100 percent corporation-owned. Two percent are fully hospital- owned. n

Articles in this issue

view archives of Becker's ASC Review - January/February 2023 Issue of Becker's ASC Review