References: 1. References: 1. Misteli H, et al. Surgical Glove Perforation and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection. Arch Surg. 2009; 144(6):553-558. 2. MHC Study #G09-005
3. Utilizing the Lean Process in Surgical Glove Standardization, Samuel E. Sullivan RN CNOR, Published Poster, AORN 2020 4. Data on File, MHC-2018-37408
Biogel delivers more TÖTAL VALUE
through lower cost-in-use and utilization savings.
1,3
The Mölnlycke and Biogel trademarks, names and logo types are registered globally to one or more of the Mölnlycke Health Care Group of Companies. Distributed by Mölnlycke
Health Care US ©2021 Mölnlycke Health Care AB. All rights reserved. MHC-2021-79413
3.5x
FEWER
FAILURES
Glove breaches can expose healthcare workers to bloodborne
pathogens and put patients at an increased risk of infection.
1
Surgical gloves differ substantially when comparing
in-use performance. In a US-based study across five
facilities measuring in-use failure rates, non-Biogel
gloves were at least 3.5 times as likely to fail as
Biogel gloves.
2
Fewer glove failures reduce the risk of exposure to pathogens
and associated treatment costs while lowering glove waste and
improving utilization.
1,3
Biogel
®
Delivers Möre
PARTNERSHIP
• Utilization reviews
• Implementation support
• Clinical education
CLINICIAN SAFETY
& SATISFACTION
• Puncture Indication System
• O.R. efficiency with standardization
• Preferred fit, feel and comfort
PROVEN
PERFORMANCE
• Fewer in-use glove failures
2
• Utilization savings
3
• Reduced infection risk for patients
1
2
4
