Becker's ASC Review

June_2019_ASC_Review

Issue link: https://beckershealthcare.uberflip.com/i/1134178

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 55

26 Thought Leadership Where a Kansas ASC plans to invest for future growth: Q&A with Director Sonja Clapp By Laura Dyrda S onja Clapp, director of AdventHealth Surgery Center Shawnee Mission in Lenexa, Kan., discussed the biggest investments her center will make over the next few years. Note: Responses were edited for style and clarity. Question: Where do you see the best opportunity for your center's strategic growth? What areas are you investing in today? Sonja Clapp: I am working on ENT at the moment, along with orthopedic. Some of the ENT cases have high disposable costs, which increases my cost per case. However, it has also increased my revenue per case. Q: How do you see your center evolving in the future? SC: We do a large number of ophthalmology procedures. I would like to see a separate area for these cases so we can become more efficient with room turnover. I believe we could double volumes. We should also be evolving to the total joints, as these are moving toward outpatient throughout the country. Finally, we are currently all on paper for our patient records. We need to go to an EMR. is would greatly increase our efficiency in reports and tracking operating room block time, as well as surgeons' efficiency and accuracy of scheduling. Q: What procedures or specialties do you see moving to the outpatient space over the next two years? SC: I am watching the vascular procedures. Some of the cardiac proce- dure codes are moving outpatient, including pacemakers, carotids and cardiac catheters. Total joints are already outpatient, but not in this area. I have been asking this question here for a couple of years and would like to see progress in this area. Q: What challenges do you anticipate for the outpatient landscape in the future? SC: Our area does not require a certificate of need. ere are many surgery centers in our area. I see it becoming survival of the fittest. We will need to continue to look for opportunities to hold onto our market share and draw in new providers. We currently are a multispecialty facility and are already very successful. We monitor the age of our surgeons to ensure we have new, young surgeons coming in as the older ones begin to retire. It is definitely about having newer technology to draw in younger surgeons with new ideas. I have found that my cost per case may increase, but so does my revenue per case. n Simplify ASC's Marta Shultz on the key ways ASCs can improve quality By Rachel Popa A SCs can improve quality in three key ways, according to Marta Shultz, vice president of quality for Simplify ASC. Note: Responses were edited for style and clarity. Question: For ASCs looking to im- prove quality, where would you recommend they start? Marta Schultz: I like to see people assess their current practices first. If you send satisfaction surveys, are you getting any negative feedback? Can you compare any of the data you collect to national benchmarks to see where you have a slight (or large) deficit? What have been your last 10 incidents reported? Many times, people try to go after what's hitting the news versus knowing or identifying their own areas for improvement. Q: Can you touch on the changing landscape of ASC quality reporting? How did the industry get to this point, and where does it go from here? MS: This is a big one. ASC quality reporting has lagged on the CMS front behind hospital reporting requirements. However, CMS is working to integrate the hospital outpa- tient standards and ASC reporting standards. Sometimes this is a good fit; sometimes it requires jamming a round peg into an oval hole. The main takeaway? This is not going away. As more extensive and expensive procedures move into ASCs, the focus on quality of procedures for CMS and as a competitive edge is going to increase. Q: What would you say are the financial implications as- sociated with ASC quality measures? MS: There are studies that show the dramatic increase to costs with infections and complications or adverse events. I don't know that anyone has really looked at the cost to reputation and to scheduling when there is an adverse event or infection. In these days of social media, having an adverse event can hit the bottom line quickly without ever having a "published" verdict. There is also the flip side for facility cost to gather information and report for ASC quality measures. It's so important that data be gathered at point of contact in order to save that time and also be available to manage any adverse events. n

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Becker's ASC Review - June_2019_ASC_Review